Question: “Hello Mr. INTJ. I am an INFP. On the net, I always find that some of the famous authors, actors, writers, artists, music composers are INFPs . But I have never found a single famous military leader, politician, athlete, player, scientist (except Einstein), sci-fi writer in the list of INFPs. All other personality types have some or more of these ranges. Even ENFPs have some world class leaders (though shown in the dark side on celebritytypes.com). In the list of INFPs there are some who have committed suicide. On the other side there are people who have committed mass homicides in other personality types. Why are INFPs always so meek in their behavior? Why are we not as outgoing as other types? I even found on the net that INFPs are the economically the poorest of all types. I will be thankful to you if you put some light on this topic. I know you can understand what I mean to say. So please answer my question as soon as possible.”
Answer: Hello Mr. big questions. I interrupted the queue just to answer this one, so first off, I’ll give you some NFP scientists to make friends with. Michio Kaku and Brian Cox are my two favourites. Go and look them up.
I can tell you right off the bat why ENFPs are more likely to be famous leaders than INFPs. It’s merely because their Te is higher up in the function hierarchy than INFPs.
As to INFPs always being meek? Actually, no, they’re not.
INFPs can be cruel hearted just like INTJs can be kind. If you’ve ever looked at lists of villains and their corresponding MBTI types, you’ll notice there aren’t a lot of NFPs. However, the ones that do exist in the canon are typically quite motivated to cause you as much pain as possible (check out my villains post for more on this).
The reason NFPs are not commonly military leaders is simply because they don’t usually possess the traits that military leadership requires. NFPs have Te, but not enough to bluntly command an army. They don’t have the Ni to make really great strategic decisions. Their Si isn’t high enough in the hierarchy to make them pragmatists. They don’t have an Se function that makes their spontaneous decisions work well in warfare.
What do they have? They have Ne: the world’s idea generator. They have dom/aux Fi that makes them too deeply feeling and not logically driven enough for warfare. The NFPs who are scientists are usually well developed in their lower functions, so rather than being all Ne/Fi, their logic is more balanced and they’re able to organise their time better.
And INFP’s Te is even lower on the function hierarchy than ENFPs, so they’re significantly less likely to defy the statistics you’ve referenced.
In terms of people in other types that have committed mass genocide, I’m going to guess you’re thinking of Hitler? Another F type capable of murder while most NFPs aren’t?
I doubt that there isn’t at least one NFP who wished they could commit mass genocide. Unlike Hitler however, NFPs don’t have his Fe charm on other people (read the Hitler post, and look specifically at his Extraverted Feeling function). NFPs are also commonly much too spontaneous and impulsive to have the focus that Hitler had. His Ni had a specific vision in mind and he pursued it until it was reality. Ne is much more easily distracted.
As to NFPs being the famous people who commit suicide –there is much pain hidden behind smiling faces. Because NFPs have an upper Fi function coupled with Ne, they often have the greatest capacity (among the types) to feel pain. Yet, they usually hide it because they don’t want to be a burden to others.
Often, having Ne/Fi as your top functions makes you an idealist, the person who smiles and inspires people when all around is chaos and darkness.
Anne Frank was that person –smiling to the day that she died in concentration camp. But look at Anne Frank on the inside. She has DEEP feelings, but they are so rooted in herself, so out of her control, and so connected to her ideals that her bad feelings towards others hardly go past writing a cruel note or wanting to yell at someone.
People with Fe in the top functions understand other people’s emotions better than their own, which makes them better manipulators when they want to be. They may be deeply hurt inside by things, but not to the extent of an NFP.
People with Fi in the lower functions have Te in the upper functions and often put their agenda before their feelings. I know I definitely do.
I hope I hit on all your main points there. I think I understood your question, but I also think your Ne might have been asking multiple questions, so If I didn’t get everything, just send me another ask or comment below.