INFJ: How I Write

Guest post by annesophie, INFJ


As a budding novelist, I spend a lot of time thinking about my characters’ minds and how they work. It seems fitting that I also take the time to look at my own mind and ask myself, with regard to the cognitive functions, how it goes about creating stories. This is my take on how being an INFJ influences my writing.

Being an INFJ, I find that my preferred method of communication (for my sake and for everyone else’s) is of the written sort. Give me a pencil, paper, and some time and I can organize my thoughts in an eloquent fashion, and even perhaps at a rapid pace. Ask me to speak in front of more than two people and…well, results may vary.

Mix this with a preference for fictional friends over most real ones and you get a socially uncomfortable over-thinker with a penchant for creating fiction.

I am by no means a brilliant author. Not yet, anyway.

A Specification: I am by no means a brilliant novelist. I’m working on it. I write short stories as well, but novel writing…that’s where my heart really is.

Here’s how my cognitive function stack as an INFJ looks in the novel-writing process.

INFJ: Ni-Fe-Ti-Se

Character Building

There is hardly an aspect of writing that I enjoy more than creating characters.Because Ni is my dominant function, I find myself interested largely in symbolism (blame Oscar Wilde for my fascination with morally questionable characters) and long term character development. Sometimes, this turns me into an obsessive, nit-picky writer so intent on genuine character growth that by the time I reach the end of the story, I realize my characters are nowhere near to having changed. Thankfully though, that isn’t usually the case. I normally have an idea of where I want a given character to end up and what themes I’d like him to portray, though it’s all fairly flexible. Having too rigid a plan rarely works in my favor; for me, too many preplanned details make for a tethered, far from lively character. I rely on my Fe to bring humanitarian appeal, developing them to be relatable (or at least understandable) to each other and the reader; I take notice of and empathize with others through reading of facial expression, and this tends to come across in my writing. My Ti, when it decides to show up (coffee helps), is useful in checking for character consistency. In the event that my Se decides to surprise me with spontaneous character behavior, trusty Ni usually manages to subconsciously take said behavior and successfully channel it into the long term plan.

Plot Developing

When it comes to creating plot lines, my Ni definitely likes to take the helm. Themes. All of the themes. All of them. There is an underlying philosophy discussion for every novel I have written or planned, whether I want there to be one or not. At one point, I made plans for a children’s story involving a cat, and suddenly existentialism and morality (Paradox? It depends, I guess. You decide.) were involved. Perhaps children’s fiction is not in my future. Fe again likes to provide the humanitarian appeal. Fairly strong stuff tends to crop up in my plots —mental breakdowns, casual mentions of murder, and oops, suddenly my characters are in Hell and Dante is patting me on the back (please?). I guess you could say I want an emotional reaction. My Ti is ever the continuity checker, responsible for putting all the elements of my story together, for looking at the entire thing and making sure that each piece of the puzzle is indeed a piece of that particular puzzle and not something like a Scrabble letter. Similarly to how it works in the realm of character building, my Se is the function that likes to shake things up and momentarily pry the story’s trajectory out of my Ni’s death grip. Ni eventually finds its footing and we go along on our merry way once more.

As a writer in general, there are plenty of places my cognitive functions come into play. To briefly list a few:

Ni has a pretty clear idea of where I’ve got to be as a writer in the next ten years, and it also has a linear plan for getting me there. Of course, with this comes the potential to be inflexible, but I’d like to think my Ni usually manifests itself as grit and perseverance instead.

Fe is aware of my audience. I keep talking about humanitarian appeal; included is the concern for not wanting to offend anyone with any of my themes or characters. This is where a little bit of Ti comes in handy.

Ti (and Ni as well) understands that, although I certainly do not want to be offensive, when I’ve got a theme I believe is important, stepping on a few toes to get it across is not a bad thing. Of course, my Ti also likes to make writing first drafts difficult by being concerned about making the wording perfect the first time around.

Se makes it difficult to work with any distractions. Coffee shops are a no-go for me. The most sensory distraction I can handle is some quiet background jazz (I can’t even listen to classical! I play violin and am familiar with a vast amount of classical music, so I get diverted trying to listen to it too intently). I suppose this could be considered a downside, but I don’t mind. It just means I have to make an effort to find someplace quiet every day.

There you have it! There are upsides and downsides to being a writer (the most concerning of the downsides possibly being that I may end up living the life of a poor, starving artist — cardboard box included) and a whole lot of nuance to the craft, and this is how it shakes out for this INFJ.

9 thoughts on “INFJ: How I Write

  1. This is absolutely true. Being an INFJ and writing out our feelings is like accomplishing passion with filling the pages with our feelings in a very pure and in a form which gives others contentment.


  2. I love this whole article. I just do.
    I am an INFJ that makes comics/manga and when writting a story my process has so many simularities with this article. Of course, novels and comics are two different things and I really admire people who can write, mainly because I can’t put in the right words the thing I have on my mind. That’s why I draw it. Expressions, landscapes, everything. It comes more naturally to me to draw a draft of 10-page comic than write a prototype of the same story in 2 pages. But I guess that’s my Se working with my Ni in the Se’s waters (pictures). I just wanted to share this. Annesophie, thank tou for this great article and I hope you become the great writer you aspire to become!!


  3. This is very relatable for me, as an INFJ writer . . . especially the planning part. I always have to plan my stories out–not down to every minute detail, necessarily, but I need to have a firm outline of what the beginning, middle, and end will look like, BEFORE I start writing. I’m always in awe of those writers who say they just start with a vague idea and see where it takes them–how do you do that, exactly? Life’s mysteries.

    I also tend to turn over story ideas in my head for months–even years–before I actually start working on them. It helps me to solidify them and to figure out exactly what themes, what tone, what aesthetic, etc. I’m going for.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Thank you, thank you for this post. As an INFJ, I felt like I had written this myself at some half-forgotten point in time. Too bad the link leads to a dead blog.

    May I ask – how does this compare to your process and style of writing as an INTJ? Also, what kind of stories do you like to write?


  5. This is amazing because I was LITERALLY thinking just this morning how my functions work to allow me as an ENTJ to write. It’s been on my mind because if NaNoWriMo. I took a crack at my own cognitive function analysis but am just barely getting to understand how cofnovore functions work beyond using prototypes to make sense of them. It’s somewhat lacking in specific examples and detail, but I’d love to know if other ENTJs see their process as this.

    Te: I know where things will end and what the stops will be along the way. If that plan doesn’t work out (which is so unlike unjust just in case) I have back up plans for how to get my characters where I need them to be. It will end exactly how I want it and happen exactly how I wanted it to. I decide what the end will be and then make it so. I create what I need in order for that outcome to happen. It’s all about the outcome.

    Ni: When I’m stuck if I walk away and take a break or nap suddenly the plot answer becomes clear to me and I know exactly what to do to get the story where I need it to be. Sometimes I’m completely surprised by the off the wall ideas I come up with out of the blue that work really well and pull several different threads together. It’s really hard for me to explain them to others though, and usually I need them to see it in writing and fitting into the story to see that t works. It’s best if I’m not even thinking of it and am doing something entirely unrelated.

    Se: I didn’t have to work hard to learn to write. I just started doing it one day. But I only bother to do things if I do them well. Otherwise I would get bored and move on. I find my ability to write is the reward I need to keep going. It’s this part of myself that makes me enjoy the journey along the way even though my Te is so singularly focused on the end goal.

    Fi: My way is the right way. Any other way of doing things, if it’s not my way, is flawed and misinformed. It’s hard for me to receive feedback about doing something a different way or taking my story in a different direction. I have to push myself to see value in it. However, I think my Te helps me overcome this only because I want to make sure that the feedback isn’t something I need to help me get to the end I am aiming for (however I don’t really need that feedback because I already know exactly what needs to happen the I get there).

    Liked by 2 people

    • ENTJ here too. I’ve recently decided to give screenwriting for TV/Film a shot. A lot of this rings true to me, although I guess I would attribute some of these to different functions in the stack. Like any MBTI function in any pursuit, these functions have sides that both help and hurt the process.

      Te: A lot of my understanding of writing comes from watching movies/TV and trying to understand and deconstruct why/how they work (or don’t!), and applying it to my own screenplays. There are also a lot of rules and conventions to screenwriting that I generally try to adhere to, because I think they make for better writing. Reconciling them all can be tricky, like solving a puzzle. Because my writing is based so much on what’s come before, many of the concepts I tackle aren’t wholly new or inventive. I would imagine NF writers have a much easier time coming up with things that feel completely new. BUT my writing tends to be well-structured and cohesive, which is probably just as important. Even when I try to make things straightforward, I end up adding layers upon layers of complexity – sometimes so much that it can be hard to follow. My early drafts tend to be a little cold and clinical, I usually have to go back in later drafts to add emotion. When I go back to edit, I can be pretty ruthless in killing my babies. If there’s a scene or sequence that isn’t working, I don’t have a problem ripping it out and putting something completely new there.

      Ni: Before I put pen to paper, I usually know why I’m writing and what I’m trying to say. I usually can’t even start outlining the script unless I have a pretty good idea of how it ends. In the case of TV, I have to figure out how the entire SERIES would end too. I usually have to know exactly where a given scene is going or what I’m trying to do before I can write it. Sometimes I even need to imagine how the scene would be shot (even though that’s more a director’s job than a writer’s) before I start writing. Once I figure out a scene in my head though, it comes pouring out pretty easily. I also am deeply interested in the theory that underpins storytelling and try to incorporate that in my writing as well. I agree with the original post about themes – if there isn’t a fundamental theme dealing with the human experience, why bother? Ni can be paralyzing at times, because I can imagine the pitfalls of a scene or can foresee what’s wrong with it as I’m writing. Sometimes, it’s better to just plow through it and go back to revise later, but Ni can hinder that.

      Se: As I mentioned in Ni, I will often try to envision how a scene is shot before it is written. For inspiration, I’ll also go back and re-watch things and try to really take a look at what makes a scene work and why. I’ll often miss little details the first time I watch something, I think partly due to Se being a tertiary function. My scene work can often be straightforward and not have the twist and turns of good writing. An SJ writer friend of mine has given me some really good tips on little details to bring these scenes to life more. I try not to be too rigid, and allow myself the freedom within scenes to improvise a little bit, and sometimes the things I come up with on the spot surprise even me. Not all of them are good surprises, but writing is an iterative process! Se can get me in trouble because sitting at a computer for hours at a time can get tedious, and I’ll often distract myself with something else when I know I should be writing.

      Fi: As I mentioned before, the emotional aspects of writing are more difficult for me. When I go back and do character passes, I tend to ask myself “what would I do in X character’s situation?” It can get me in trouble because as a result, every character can start to sound the same if I’m not vigilant. MBTI is actually a very useful tool in this regard, because I don’t intuit emotional states very easily and it gives me some guidelines on how to differentiate characters. Similar to Meghan, sometimes I might take criticism personally and be stubborn at first. But, I’ll force myself put any notes through the Te prism, and override my Fi and adjust if necessary.


      • This is a nice breakdown that I can relate to very well. Especially the part where my characters can all end up sounding the same. Your entire Te section nailed it for me.


  6. As an INFJ writer, I definitely relate to this. I once wrote a children’s story for science class demonstrating scientific laws and it ended up making fun of the rigidity of human thinking. Whoops.

    Great post, annesophie!

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply to Boom Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s